Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel v. Donald Rumsfeld, United States of America and Unidentified Agents

| | TrackBacks (0)
The reason this case is the first against so high an American official to have survived so far is that the two plaintiffs are American citizens. In his 39-page March 5 ruling, Judge Andersen quoted from Justice Sandra O'Connor's decision for the Supreme Court in the 2004 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case: "We have long since made clear that a state of war is not a blank check for the president when it comes to the rights of American citizens."

But what about the great number of non-Americans who have been subject to the U.S. torture policy?

See full size image

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel v. Donald Rumsfeld, United States of America and Unidentified Agents.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.firejohnyoo.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1225

UC Berkeley Billboard

press conference, protest, photos, video, reports

Donations via PayPal
are not tax deductible.




Events & Calendars

War Criminals Watch Events



Important Reading

Physicians for Human Rights
Broken Laws, Broken Lives

NLG White Paper
ON THE LAW OF TORTURE...

The President's Executioner

Detention and torture in Guantanamo



About this Entry

This page contains a single entry published on March 25, 2010 12:28 PM.

White House poised for wave of military tribunals, expected to overrule Attorney General Eric Holder's order for civilian courts was the previous entry in this blog.

former State Department attorney recalls the "Summer of Torture", is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Login

  AUTHOR'S LOGIN

Contact

  info@firejohnyoo.net