Zero Dark Thirty, the CIA and film critics have a very bad evening
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58eb3/58eb3e61aae4a48c6b6d09885c28320bae7b4cc4" alt="er1.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58eb3/58eb3e61aae4a48c6b6d09885c28320bae7b4cc4" alt="er1.jpg"
This is a rare case of some justice being done. There's little question that the objections to its pro-torture depictions and CIA propaganda were what sunk the film. In explaining why its Oscar chances had all but disappeared, the Atlantic's Richard Lawson explained last month that as a result of the controversy, the film has "just become something vaguely taboo". That's a good thing, as it should be taboo. The film is unsurprisingly a box office success, earning in excess of $100 million...
it's both gratifying and a bit surprising to see that this CIA-shaped jingoistic celebration of America's proudest moment of the last decade - finding bin Laden, pumping his skull full of bullets, and then dumping his corpse into the ocean - ended up with the stigma it deserves. -- Glenn Greenwald
Actor David Clennon (left) protests the film with other members of the "Committee for Sanitizing Crimes Against Humanity."